Person Years and Person Months

Doctor giving adult patient an injection
Doctor giving adult patient an injection. Mark Bowden/Vetta/Getty Images

What is a Person Year?

When scientists perform certain types of prospective studies - studies where they follow a large group of people over time - they measure that time in person years or person months. These types of measurement take into account both the number of people in the study and the amount of time each person spends in the study. For example, a study that followed 1000 people for 1 year would contain 1000 person years of data.

A study that followed 100 people for 10 years would also contain 1000 person years of data. The trade off there would be that fewer people were studied with a longer follow-up time for each one.

Survival Analysis

Person years and person months are often used as a measurement of time in studies that analyze their data using Kaplan-Meier curves. This "survival analysis" allows scientists to estimate how long it takes for half of a population to have undergone an event. It is called survival analysis because the technique was initially developed to look at how various factors affected the length of life. However, today survival analysis is used by researchers across a number of fields - from economics to medicine - since it is more forgiving of certain types of data problems than other types of analysis.

STD Studies Using Person Years

A number of research studies looking at sexually transmitted diseases have used person years as a component of their analyses.

A few examples are described below:

  • A 2015 study looking at whether hepatitis C (HCV) infection increased the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and related health consequences, which found that HCV infection did increase DVT risk but not the rate of pulmonary emboli (blood clots in the lungs.)
  • A 2014 study looking at how often people living with HIV are long-term nonprogressors, which found that even if people make it to 10 years post infection without progressing, most of them will eventually progress to AIDS without treatment.
  • A 2013 study demonstrating that women presenting for infertility treatment are less likely to be able to get pregnant, without IVF, if they test positive for chlamydia than if they don't.


Keltz MD, Sauerbrun-Cutler MT, Durante MS, Moshier E, Stein DE, Gonzales E. Positive Chlamydia trachomatis serology result in women seeking care for infertility is a negative prognosticator for intrauterine pregnancy. Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Nov;40(11):842-5. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000035.

van der Helm JJ, Geskus R, Lodi S, Meyer L, Schuitemaker H, Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer B, Monforte Ad, Olson A, Touloumi G, Sabin C, Porter K, Prins M; CASCADE Collaboration in EuroCoord. Characterisation of long-term non-progression of HIV-1 infection after seroconversion: a cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2014 Oct;1(1):e41-8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(14)70016-5.

Wang CC, Chang CT, Lin CL, Lin IC, Kao CH. Hepatitis C Virus Infection Associated With an Increased Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(38):e1585. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001585.

Continue Reading